Pelvic organ prolapse meshes: Can they preserve the physiological behavior?

Implants for the cure of female genital prolapse still show numerous complications cases that sometimes have dramatic consequences. These implants must be improved to provide physiological support and restore the normal functionalities of the pelvic area. Besides the trend towards lighter meshes, a better understanding of the in vivo role and impact of the mesh implantation is required. This work investigates the mechanical impact of meshes after implantation with regards to the behavior of the native tissues. Three meshes were studied to assess their mechanical and biological impact on the native tissues. An animal study was conducted on rats. Four groups (n = 17/group) underwent surgery. Rats were implanted on the abdominal wall with one of the three polypropylene knitted mesh (one mesh/group). The last group served as control and underwent the same surgery without any mesh implantation. Post-operative complications, contraction, mechanical rigidities, and residual deformation after cyclic loading were collected. Non-parametric statistical comparisons were performed (Kruskal-Wallis) to observe potential differences between implanted and control groups. Mechanical characterization showed that one of the three meshes did not alter the mechanical behavior of the native tissues. On the contrary, the two others drastically increased the rigidities and were also associated with clinical complications. All of the meshes seem to reduce the geometrical lengthening of the biological tissues that comes with repetitive loads. Mechanical aspects might play a key role in the compatibility of the mesh in vivo. One of the three materials that were implanted during an animal study seems to provide better support and adapt more properly to the physiological behavior of the native tissues.

Automated summary

This study investigated the mechanical and biological impact of three different mesh implants on native tissues. It was found that one of the materials did not alter the mechanical behavior of the tissues, while the other two significantly increased rigidity and led to clinical complications. All meshes reduced the geometric lengthening of tissues under repetitive loads, suggesting that mechanical aspects may play a key role in the compatibility of mesh implants in vivo. One of the materials showed better support and adapted more properly to the physiological behavior of native tissues during an animal study.