4.7 Article

Redox proteomic profiling of neuroketal-adducted proteins in human brain: Regional vulnerability at middle age increases in the elderly

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 1-15

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.02.034

关键词

Aging; Oxidative damage; Oligomers; Lipoxidation

资金

  1. Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission [278486]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Institute de Salud Carlos III - Fondos FEDER [PI14/00757, PI14/00328]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein lipoxidation was assessed in the parietal cortex (PC), frontal cortex (FC), and cingulate gyms (CG) in middle-aged and old-aged individuals with no clinical manifestations of cognitive impairment, in order to increase understanding of regional brain vulnerability to oxidative damage during aging. Twenty-five lipoxidized proteins were identified in all the three regions although with regional specificities, by using redox proteomics to detect target proteins of neuroketals (NKT) adduction. The number of cases with NKT-adducted proteins was higher in old-aged individuals but most oxidized proteins were already present in middle-aged individuals. Differences in vulnerability to oxidation were dependent on the sub-cellular localization, secondary structure, and external exposition of certain amino acids. Lipoxidized proteins included those involved in energy metabolism, cytoskeleton, proteostasis, neurotransmission and O-2/CO2, and heme metabolism. Total NKT and soluble oligomer levels were estimated employing slot-blot, and these were compared between age groups. Oligomers increased with age in PC and FC; NKT significantly increased with age in FC, whereas total NKT and oligomer levels were not modified in CG, thus highlighting differences in brain regional vulnerability with age. Oligomers significantly correlated with NKT levels in the three cortical regions, suggesting that protein NKT adduction parallels soluble oligomer formation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据