4.7 Article

Unmasking the anomalous rapid oxidation of refractory TiB2 at low temperatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 5100-5108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.04.011

关键词

Anomalous rapid oxidation; Refractory TiB2; Bi-layer oxide scale; Oxide scale configuration; Interfacial channels

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [E2019203522]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51801173]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M641673]
  4. High-Level Talents Research Program of the Yanshan University [005000201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The monolithic TiB2 undergoes rapid oxidation behavior at around 500 degrees C due to the formation of a bi-layer oxide scale, while at 650 degrees C, the oxide scale changes its structure and restores superior oxidation resistance. The configuration of the oxide scale is found to primarily determine the oxidation behavior of TiB2, which has been overlooked in previous studies.
As a refractory transition-metal diboride, monolithic TiB2 oxidizes at temperatures below 400 degrees C. Here, we performed detailed microstructural investigations to study the low-temperature oxidation mechanism of monolithic TiB2. An anomalous rapid oxidation behavior is observed at similar to 500 degrees C, where the oxidation rate is much higher than that at a higher temperature of 650 degrees C. The anomalous rapid oxidation behavior originates from an unreported bi-layer oxide scale consisting of outer homogeneous B2O3/TiO2 mixed layer with a suprananometre-sized dual-phase amorphous-crystal microstructure and inner unstable Ti-B-O amorphous layer. By contrast, the oxide scale changes from homogeneous mixed microstructure to a laminated configuration at 650 degrees C, restoring the superior oxidation resistance. Our experimental results indicate that it is the configuration of the oxide scale that determines primarily the oxidation behavior of TiB2, which has been seldom envisaged in previous studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据