4.7 Article

SEraMic: A semi-automatic method for the segmentation of grain boundaries

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 5349-5358

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.03.062

关键词

SEM; BSE; Ceramic; Segmentation; Grain size

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SEraMic method, implemented in the SEraMic plugin for Fiji or ImageJ software, is used to calculate a segmented image of ceramic cross sections that shows grain boundaries. It accurately determines grain boundary positions and evaluates grain size distribution in various materials, remaining easy to use and accurate when the average grain diameter is greater than or equal to 0.25 µm.
The SEraMic method, implemented in the SEraMic plugin for Fiji or ImageJ software, was developed to calculate a segmented image of a ceramic cross section that shows the grain boundaries. This method was used to accurately and automatically determine grain boundary positions and further assess the grain size distribution of monophasic ceramics, metals, and alloys. The only required sample preparation is polishing the cross section to a mirror-like finish. The SEraMic method is based on at least six backscattered electron scanning electron microscopy images of a unique region of interest with various tilt angles ranging from -5 degrees to +5 degrees, which emphasises the orientation contrasts of the grains. Because the orientation contrast varies with the incident beam angle on the sample, the set of images contains information related to all the grain boundaries. The SEraMic plugin automatically calculates and builds a segmented image of the grain boundaries from the set of tilted images. The SEraMic method was compared with classical thermal etching methods, and it was applied to determine the grain boundaries in various types of materials (oxides, phosphates, carbides, and alloys). The method remains easy to use and accurate when the average grain diameter is greater than or equal to 0.25 mu m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据