4.6 Article

Implementation of a Physics-Based Model for Half-Cell Open-Circuit Potential and Full-Cell Open-Circuit Voltage Estimates: Part I. Processing Half-Cell Data

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac11a4

关键词

Open-circuit voltage; open-circuit potential; missing-data problem; inaccessible-lithium problem; thermodynamic model; differential-capacity data smoothing

资金

  1. Cummins Inc.
  2. Department of Energy, Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), AMPED program [DE-AR0000271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses physics-based electrochemical models of lithium-ion cells and compares five different approaches to solving the electrode open-circuit potential relationships through experimental data. These methods are able to accommodate different cell chemistries and be utilized in real-time battery management systems.
Physics-based electrochemical models of lithium-ion cells require knowledge of electrode open-circuit potential (OCP) as a function of stoichiometry. To determine the OCP relationships for a cell built from unknown active materials, we might run low-rate constant-current laboratory tests on half cells built from harvested electrodes to collect related discharge and charge data. However, processing data from these tests must overcome three problems: the data-quality problem, the missing-data problem, and the inaccessible-lithium problem. This paper introduces a simple histogram-based method to overcome the data-quality problem and compares five different approaches to overcome the missing-data and inaccessible-lithium problems. These methods rely in part on a physics-based thermodynamic model for multiple-species multiple-reaction (MSMR) systems, which is flexible enough to accommodate different cell chemistries and simple enough to be utilized in real-time battery management systems. The five methods are validated in simulations and are then applied to physical half-cell data to produce OCP estimates for graphite and NMC electrodes from a commercial cell.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据