4.6 Article

Bagged Filters for Partially Observed Interacting Systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 118, 期 542, 页码 1078-1089

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2021.1974867

关键词

Monte Carlo; Particle filter; Population dynamics; Sequential Markov process

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bagging, the combination of bootstrap estimators, is applied to infer from noisy or incomplete measurements in a collection of interacting stochastic dynamic systems. This paper introduces the bagged filter (BF) methodology, which utilizes spatiotemporally localized weights to select successful filters. The BF method outperforms other filters in modeling infectious disease transmission.
Bagging (i.e., bootstrap aggregating) involves combining an ensemble of bootstrap estimators. We consider bagging for inference from noisy or incomplete measurements on a collection of interacting stochastic dynamic systems. Each system is called a unit, and each unit is associated with a spatial location. A motivating example arises in epidemiology, where each unit is a city: the majority of transmission occurs within a city, with smaller yet epidemiologically important interactions arising from disease transmission between cities. Monte Carlo filtering methods used for inference on nonlinear non-Gaussian systems can suffer from a curse of dimensionality (COD) as the number of units increases. We introduce bagged filter (BF) methodology which combines an ensemble of Monte Carlo filters, using spatiotemporally localized weights to select successful filters at each unit and time. We obtain conditions under which likelihood evaluation using a BF algorithm can beat a COD, and we demonstrate applicability even when these conditions do not hold. BF can out-perform an ensemble Kalman filter on a coupled population dynamics model describing infectious disease transmission. A block particle filter (BPF) also performs well on this task, though the bagged filter respects smoothness and conservation laws that a BPF can violate. for this article are available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据