4.5 Article

A Multidimensional Mass Spectrometry-Based Workflow for De Novo Structural Elucidation of Oligosaccharides from Polysaccharides

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jasms.1c00133

关键词

oligosaccharide analysis; monosaccharide analysis; linkage analysis; polysaccharides; quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry; triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK124193]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbohydrates play crucial roles in biological processes, but characterizing their structures is challenging. A new mass spectrometry-based workflow was developed to elucidate oligosaccharide structures. This approach successfully analyzed oligosaccharides from standards and food products, revealing their detailed structures.
Carbohydrates play essential roles in a variety of biological processes that are dictated by their structures. However, characterization of carbohydrate structures remains extremely difficult and generally unsolved. In this work, a de novo mass spectrometry-based workflow was developed to isolate and structurally elucidate oligosaccharides to provide sequence, monosaccharide compositions, and glycosidic linkage positions. The approach employs liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based methods in a 3-dimensional concept: one high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-QTOF MS) analysis for oligosaccharide sequencing and two ultra high performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QqQ MS) analyses on fractionated oligosaccharides to determine their monosaccharides and linkages compositions. The workflow was validated by applying the procedure to maltooligosaccharide standards. The approach was then used to determine the structures of oligosaccharides derived from polysaccharide standards and whole food products. The integrated LC-MS workflow will reveal the in-depth structures of oligosaccharides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据