4.6 Article

Similar mortality risk in incident cognitive impairment and dementia: Evidence from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 69, 期 12, 页码 3568-3575

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17435

关键词

cause of death; cognitive impairment; dementia; mortality

资金

  1. Monash University
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [1127060, 1140485, 334047]
  3. National Institute on Aging at the NIH [U01AG029824]
  4. National Cancer Institute at the NIH [U01AG029824]
  5. Victorian Cancer Agency
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1140485] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Older adults with newly detected cognitive impairment or dementia in the ASPREE trial had a higher mortality risk compared to those without cognitive impairment. The mortality rates were similar between those meeting DSM-IV criteria for dementia and those who triggered for a dementia evaluation but did not meet the criteria. This group was more likely to die from sepsis, respiratory disease, and dementia, but less likely to die from cancer compared to the group without triggers.
Background This study examined the risk of mortality in older adults with newly detected cognitive impairment or dementia. Methods Data from the Australian cohort of the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial were examined. The ASPREE clinical trial compared daily low-dose aspirin to a placebo and involved 16,703 individuals aged 70 years and over, who were without major cognitive impairment, physical disability, or cardiovascular disease at recruitment. During the trial, evidence of cognitive impairment, based on cognitive testing and medical record information, triggered dementia adjudication of participants using DSM-IV criteria. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare mortality rates across the dementia, trigger-only, and no-trigger groups. Results Over a median 4.7-year follow-up period, 806 participants triggered dementia adjudication, with 485 (60.2%) judged to have dementia. Following recruitment, mortality risks were 32.9, 33.6, and 10.8 events per 1000 person-years in the dementia, trigger-no-dementia, and no-trigger groups, respectively. In the fully adjusted model, mortality risks remained higher in the dementia and trigger-no-dementia groups, with hazard ratios of 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3-2.1) and 1.9 (95% CI: 1.5-2.6), respectively. There was no discernible difference between the dementia and trigger-no-dementia groups in mortality rates following recruitment, or following a dementia trigger. These two groups were more likely to die from sepsis, respiratory disease, and dementia, but less likely to die from cancer than the no-trigger group, chi(2) = 161.5, p < 0.001. Conclusion ASPREE participants who triggered for a dementia evaluation experienced a substantially higher mortality rate than those who remained cognitively intact. The increase was indistinguishable among persons who met DSM-IV criteria for dementia vs. those who triggered for a dementia evaluation but failed to meet DSM-IV criteria. Future work should investigate whether earlier detection of cognitive decline can be used to identify and prevent early mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据