4.7 Article

Association of Variants Near the Bradykinin Receptor B2 Gene With Angioedema in Patients Taking ACE Inhibitors

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.054

关键词

ACE inhibitors; ADR; angioedema; bradykinin; adverse drug reaction; bradykinin receptor B < sub > 2 <; sub >

资金

  1. John and Birthe Meyer Foundation
  2. Research Foundation at Rigshospitalet
  3. Innovation Fund Denmark (PM Heart)
  4. NordForsk
  5. Villadsen Family Foundation (Copenhagen, Denmark)
  6. Arvid Nilsson Foundation (Copenhagen, Denmark)
  7. Hallas-Moller Emerging Investigator Novo Nordisk (Copenhagen, Denmark) [NNF17OC0031204]
  8. Novo Nordisk Foundation (Copenhagen, Denmark) [NNF17OC0027594, NNF14CC0001]
  9. Swedish Research Council (Uppsala, Sweden) [521-2011-2440, 521-2014-3370, 2018-03307]
  10. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation (Uppsala, Sweden) [20120557, 20140291, 20170711]
  11. Medical Products Agency (Uppsala, Sweden)
  12. Selander's Foundation (Uppsala, Sweden)
  13. Thureus' Foundation and Clinical Research Support Avtal om Lakarutbildning och Forskning (Uppsala, Sweden)
  14. Swedish Research Council [2017-00641]
  15. Swedish Research Council [2018-03307] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  16. Vinnova [2018-03307] Funding Source: Vinnova

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A genetic locus at chromosome 14q32.2 was found to be associated with ACE inhibitor-related angioedema in individuals of European descent. Carriers of the risk allele had significantly lower blood pressure, suggesting a potential mechanism linking genetic variants near the bradykinin receptor B2 gene with angioedema risk.
BACKGROUND Angioedema is a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse reaction associated with angiotensinconverting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Identification of potential genetic factors related to this adverse event may help identify at-risk patients. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to identify genetic factors associated with ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema. METHODS A genomewide association study involving patients of European descent, all taking ACE inhibitors, was conducted in a discovery cohort (Copenhagen Hospital Biobank), and associations were confirmed in a replication cohort (Swedegene). Cases were defined as subjects with angioedema events and filled prescriptions for ACE inhibitors #180 days before the events. Control subjects were defined as those with continuous treatment with ACE inhibitors without any history of angioedema. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for angioedema risk using logistic mixed model regression analysis. Summary statistics from the discovery and replication cohorts were analyzed using a fixed-effects meta-analysis model. RESULTS The discovery cohort consisted of 462 cases and 53,391 ACE inhibitor-treated control subjects. The replication cohort consisted of 142 cases and 1,345 ACE inhibitor-treated control subjects. In the discovery cohort, 1 locus, residing at chromosome 14q32.2, was identified that associated with angioedema at the genomewide significance level of P <5 x 10-8. The lead variant at this locus, rs34485356, is an intergenic variant located 60 kb upstream of BDKRB2 (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.38 to 1.90; P = 4.3 x 10-9). This variant was validated in our replication cohort with a similar direction and effect size (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.25; P = 7.2 x 10-3). We found that carriers of the risk allele had significantly lower systolic (-0.46 mm Hg per T allele; 95% CI:-0.83 to-0.10; P = 0.013) and diastolic (-0.26 mm Hg per T allele; 95% CI:-0.46 to-0.05; P = 0.013) blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS In this genomewide association study involving individuals treated with ACE inhibitors, we found that common variants located in close proximity to the bradykinin receptor B2 gene were associated with increased risk for ACE inhibitor-related angioedema. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:696-709) <(c)> 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Superscript/Subscript Available

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据