4.8 Article

Chiral Phosphine-Copper Iodide Hybrid Cluster Assemblies for Circularly Polarized Luminescence

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 143, 期 29, 页码 10860-10864

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c05476

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52073271, 21875236, 21573211, 21633007, 22161142004]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2060190085]
  3. Hefei National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory [KY2060000172]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Luminescence and Applications [SKLA-2020-06]
  5. Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies [AHY090200]
  6. USTC Center for Micro and Nanoscale Research and Fabrication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents robust chiral phosphine-copper iodide hybrid clusters capable of assembling into different forms of chiral crystalline CPL materials, demonstrating potential applications through the fabrication of an electroluminescent device using highly oriented crystalline films.
Chiral chromophores and their ordered assemblies are intriguing for yielding circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) and exploring intrinsic structure-light emission relationships. With the extensively studied chiral organic molecules and inorganic nanoparticle assemblies for the amplified CPL, the assemblies of copper halide hybrid clusters have attracted intensive attention due to their potential efficient CPL. Here, we report robust chiral phosphine-copper iodide hybrid clusters and their layered assemblies in crystalline states for amplified CPL. We reveal that the intermolecular interactions endow the clusters with the capability of assembling into chiral crystalline CPL materials, including hexagonal platelet-shaped microcrystals (g(lum) approximate to 9.5 x 10(-3)) and highly oriented crystalline films (g(lum) approximate to 5 x 10(-3)). Owing to the high crystalline feature of the thin film, we demonstrate an electroluminescent device with bright electroluminescence (1200 cd m(-2)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据