4.8 Article

Access to Highly Stereodefined 1,4-cis-Polydienes by a [Ni/Mg] Orthogonal Tandem Catalytic Polymerization

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 143, 期 33, 页码 13401-13407

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c06553

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Geneva
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_159199]
  3. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-19-CE09-0020]
  4. Chimie ParisTech
  5. Institut Universitaire de France
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-19-CE09-0020] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_159199] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A [Ni/Mg]-catalyzed orthogonal tandem polymerization has been developed, starting from enol phosphates and leading to 1,4-cis-polydienes with selectivities up to 99%. By simple structural modifications of the monomeric unit, elastomeric or crystalline materials can be obtained. This tandem approach provides a straightforward and efficient way to enforce diversity and selectivity in diene polymerization while retaining a fair degree of control.
A [Ni/Mg]-catalyzed orthogonal tandem polymerization has been developed starting from enol phosphates. Initial investigations conducted on branched 1,3-dienes as monomers enabled identification of a Mg-initiated polymerization process leading to 1,4-cis-polydienes. When aryl enol phosphates are used as monomers, the [Ni/Mg]-catalyzed tandem polymerization affords 1,4-cis-polydienes with selectivities up to 99%. Elastomeric or crystalline materials were obtained by simple structural modifications of the monomeric unit. This tandem approach appears as a straightforward and efficient way to enforce diversity and selectivity in diene polymerization while retaining a fair degree of control, just as observed for stepwise systems that are accessible through established time- and manpower-consuming synthetic procedures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据