4.7 Article

Design and synthesis of a novel spinnable polyborazine precursor with high ceramic yield via one-pot copolymerization

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 104, 期 11, 页码 5509-5520

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.17950

关键词

BN fibers; copolymerization; polyborazane; polymer-derived ceramics; precursor design and synthesis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61701514, 51773226]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel polymer precursor PPMAB was designed and synthesized with high ceramic yield and concentrated molecular weight distribution, showing excellent and stable spinnability.
Synthesis of spinnable precursors with high ceramic yield is a crucial issue in BN fibers manufacturing by polymer-derived ceramics (PDCs) route. Spinnability and high ceramic yield are the basis of precursor processability, formability, and mechanical properties. Herein, based on DFT simulation, we designed and synthesized a novel polymer precursor poly[2-propylamino-4,6-bis(methylamino) borazine-co-tri(methylamino) borazine] (PPMAB) via a facile one-pot copolymerization strategy. The random copolymerization model of condensations was obtained through DFT calculation. The molecular chain structure, molecular weight, and molecular weight distribution were optimized by adjusting the synthesis conditions. The precursor PPMAB-1:1 with a high ceramic yield of 62.43% and concentrated molecular weight distribution (PDI < 1.3) was obtained. Rheological performance research revealed the excellent and stable spinnability of PPMAB-1:1 by the tunable viscosity and low flow activation energy (23.61 kJ/mol). As a demonstration of spinnability, continuous BN fiber with a fine diameter (>10 km, 7.60 +/- 1.13 mu m, and 1.6 GPa) was obtained after melt spinning. The present work effectively improved the ceramic yield and spinnability of polyborazine precursors. Simultaneously, it can be used extensively as a universal method to prepare multifunctional copolymers with precise structure control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据