4.7 Article

Correlation between grain size and electrical properties of high-temperature lead-free 0.70BiFeO3-0.30BaTiO3 ceramics

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 105, 期 2, 页码 862-872

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.18138

关键词

0; 70BF-0; 30BT ceramics; electrical properties; grain-size effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872180, 11704242, 51672169]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [18ZR1414800, 17ZR1447200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrical properties of 0.70BF-0.30BT ceramics initially increase and then slightly decrease with grain size, with the best performance observed in ceramics with a grain size of 5.0 μm.
0.70BiFeO(3)-0.30BaTiO(3) (0.70BF-0.30BT) ceramics have been widely concerned because of their potential applications for high-temperature piezoelectric devices. In this work, a series of dense 0.70BF-0.30BT ceramics with average grain size variation from 0.55 to 6.0 mu m were prepared. XRD results indicate that 0.70BF-0.30BT ceramics show the coexistence of rhombohedral and pseudo-cubic phases and the volume fraction of the rhombohedral phase increase with the grain size. The dielectric, ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties increase with the grain size initially from 0.55 to 5.0 mu m and then decrease slightly. Values of d(33), P-r, and epsilon(r,) of 0.70BF-0.30BT ceramics with the grain size of 5.0 mu m are 185 pC/N, 21.2 mu C/cm(2), and 638, respectively, about five times higher than those ceramics with fine-grain of 0.55 mu m. Of particular importance is that 0.70BF-0.30BT ceramics with large grain sizes possess better piezoelectric thermal stability due to the much stabler poled domain state with the rising temperature. The detailed structural studies indicate that the enhanced electric properties are owing to the significantly improved domain motion and the increased lattice distortion. This clarifying the relationship between electrical properties and grain size offers a novel way of improving the performances of piezoceramics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据