4.5 Article

Audiometric assessment of hearing loss sustained during military service

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 150, 期 2, 页码 1030-1043

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0005846

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An analysis was conducted on the audiograms of 80 men claiming compensation for noise-induced hearing loss sustained during military service, with findings showing that M-NIHL is typically greatest at 3, 4, 6, or 8 kHz, but with considerable individual variability. The asymmetry in hearing threshold levels (HTLs) between left and right ears could usually be attributed to specific features of noise exposure, supporting the idea that M-NIHL occurs over a wide frequency range, with tinnitus being common among the subjects.
An analysis is presented of the audiograms, obtained using Telephonics TDH39 headphones (Huntington, NY), of 80 men claiming compensation for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) sustained during military service. A comparison with an independent database of audiograms collected using other headphones suggested that no adjustment was needed to the hearing threshold levels (HTLs) at 6 kHz to allow for the use of TDH39 headphones. The method of Moore [(2020). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148, 884-894] for diagnosing military noise-induced hearing loss (M-NIHL) gave a positive diagnosis for 92.5% of right ears and 97.5% of left ears. The mean HTLs were maximal and similar at 4, 6, and 8 kHz but with considerable individual variability. A comparison with age-expected HTLs showed that M-NIHL was typically greatest at 3, 4, 6, or 8 kHz but with considerable individual variability. M-NIHL values were positive from 0.5 to 8 kHz. The HTLs were significantly higher for the left than for the right ears, but the asymmetry varied across individuals and could usually be ascribed to specific features of the noise exposure. The asymmetry existed over the range from 0.5 to 8 kHz, supporting the idea that M-NIHL occurs over a wide frequency range. Tinnitus was reported by 76 of the 80 men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据