4.5 Article

Perception of the acoustic environment during COVID-19 lockdown in Argentina

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 149, 期 6, 页码 3902-3909

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0005131

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Scientific and Technical Research Council of Argentina (CONICET)
  2. National Technological University (UTN-FRC), Cordoba, Argentina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study described changes in the perception of the acoustic environment among residents in Argentina during the COVID-19 lockdown. Most participants preferred the new acoustic environment during the lockdown, with biological sounds bringing feelings of tranquility and happiness.
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly modified the behavior of societies. The application of isolation measures during the crisis resulted in changes in the acoustic environment. The aim of this work was to characterize the perception of the acoustic environment during the COVID-19 lockdown of people residing in Argentina in 2020. A descriptive cross-sectional correlational study was carried out. A virtual survey was conducted from April 14 to 26, 2020, and was answered mainly by social network users. During this period, Argentina was in a strict lockdown. The sample was finally composed of 1371 people between 18 and 79years old. It was observed that most of the participants preferred the new acoustic environment. Mainly in the larger cities, before the isolation, mechanical sounds predominated, accompanied by the perception of irritation. Confinement brought a decrease in mechanical sounds and an increase in biological sounds, associated with feelings of tranquility and happiness. The time window opened by the lockdown offered an interesting scenario to assess the effect of anthropogenic noise pollution on the urban environment. This result offers a subjective approach, which contributes to understanding the link between individuals and communities with the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据