4.3 Article

Thermodynamic Properties of the Superconducting State in Metallic Hydrogen: Electronic Correlations, Non-conventional Electron-Phonon Couplings and the Anharmonic Effects

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10948-020-05781-y

关键词

Superconductor; Metallic hydrogen; Non-conventional electron-phonon couplings; Anharmonic effects

资金

  1. ERDF/ESF project Nanotechnologies for Future [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000754]
  2. [003/RID/2018/19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermodynamical properties of the superconducting state in metallic hydrogen were determined based on the model of two compressed hydrogen planes, considering electronic correlations and non-conventional electron-phonon coupling functions. The critical temperature values are significantly affected by the inclusion or omission of certain factors, while other thermodynamic quantities align closely with predictions from the BCS theory.
Thermodynamical properties of the superconducting state in metallic hydrogen were determined on the basis of the model of two compressed hydrogen planes. We took into account both the on-site and the inter-site electronic correlations (U and K), as well as the relevant non-conventional electron-phonon coupling functions (g(U) and g(K)). We proved, within the Eliashberg formalism, that the maximum value of the critical temperature of transition into the superconducting state is about 200 K for the harmonic approximation, and about 84 K for the Morse anharmonic approximation. Omission of the electronic correlations results in a considerable overstatement of the T-C value. On the other hand, the T-C value is remarkably understated if the non-conventional interactions are disregarded. Other thermodynamic quantities, such as the order parameter, the jump in the specific heat value, the thermodynamic critical field, and the upper critical field, take the values for which the non-dimensional ratios R-Delta, R-C, R-H and R-H2 do not differ substantially from the predictions of the BCS theory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据