4.6 Article

Bi-doped GaTe single crystals: Growth and thermoelectric properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 298, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2021.122155

关键词

Gallium telluride; Thermoelectric; Doping; Carrier concentration; Phonon scattering

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2019R1F1A1058473, NRF-2019R1A6A1A11053838, NRF-2020K1A4A7A02095438]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020K1A4A7A02095438] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bismuth (Bi) was utilized to increase hole concentration in GaTe by substituting Te sites, leading to enhanced thermoelectric performance. Bi-doped GaTe single crystals showed improved carrier mobility and enhanced electrical conductivity and power factor. The thermal transport properties of GaTe single crystals were less affected by Bi doping, while a peak zT value of around 0.02 was achieved at 700 K for Bi-doped GaTe single crystals.
Here bismuth (Bi) was utilized to substitute Te sites to increase the hole concentration, thereby enhancing the thermoelectric performance of GaTe. Bi-doped GaTe single crystals have successfully been fabricated by a temperature gradient technique. Bi atoms acting as acceptors helped to increase hole concentration from 9.43 x 10(15) cm(3) for pristine GaTe to 0.63, 0.90, 1.20, and 1.63 x 10(17) cm(-3) for BGT-1, BGT-2, BGT-3, and BGT-4 single crystals, respectively. Moreover, the carrier mobility was increased up to 68.25 cm(2)V(-1)s(-)(1) due to the crystallinity improvement of GaTe. Consequently, the electrical conductivity and power factor (PF) reached the respective maximum values of 3.62 S cm(-1) and 1.21 1.1W cm(-1) K-2 at 500 K for BGT-4 crystals. Meanwhile, Bi doping less affected the thermal transport properties of GaTe single crystals. A peak zT of similar to 0.02 was achieved at 700 K for the BGT-4 sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据