4.6 Article

Hydrogen evolution reaction of one 2D cobalt coordination polymer with coordinated sulfate ion

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 299, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2021.122191

关键词

Coordination polymer; Hydrogen evolution reaction; Sulfate ion; Synergistic effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21601045]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M601768]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JZ2019HGTB0059, 202010359097]
  4. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control (KHK 2012)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized sulfuric acid doping to enhance the electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance of coordination polymers, resulting in the synthesis of a cobalt-based coordination polymer with excellent performance and low onset potential, small Tafel slope, and overpotential.
At present, the shortage of energy is becoming more serious. As a new energy source, hydrogen energy is expected to solve the problem of energy shortage. We considered that doping sulfur may lead to better electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution (HER) performance of the coordination polymers. Therefore, we added sulfuric acid to adjust pH and expected to introduce sulfate ions into the structure during the synthesis. Finally, one cobalt-based coordination polymer (CP) was synthesized, namely {[Co-4(bibp)(4)(SO42-)(4)(H2O)(8)]}(n) (1) (bibp = 4,4'-bisimidazolylbiphenyl). As expected, this synergistic effect of cobalt, carbon and sulfur in the structure may enable compound 1 after calcination at high temperature to have better electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance. It has a low onset potential and Tafel slope of -137mV and 115 mV dec(-1), respectively, and an overpotential of -252mV at a current density of 10 mA cm(-2). And we also found that the material also has low resistivity and good stability with a good activity after 8 h of cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据