4.5 Review

Health-related quality of life in narcolepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13383

关键词

narcolepsy; quality of life; health‐ related quality of life

资金

  1. Physiotherapy Department in St James' Hospital, Dublin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Narcolepsy patients have significantly lower health-related quality of life compared to general population norms and patients with other chronic diseases, with physical component less affected than mental component. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term effects and develop a specific assessment tool.
To date, there has been no systematic analysis of the literature regarding health-related quality of life in narcolepsy. This systematic review aimed to examine the impact of narcolepsy on health-related quality of life, measured through standardised health-related quality of life questionnaires such as the Short Form 36 and Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire. The following databases: Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Web of Science were searched for studies that investigated health-related quality of life in adults with narcolepsy. Studies were reviewed independently by two reviewers, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed. A total of 30 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Additionally, meta-analyses were conducted for the Short Form 36 and the EQ5D. The Short Form 36 meta-analysis identified that the pooled mean scores for the Physical Component (45.91) were less affected than the Mental Component (42.98). People with narcolepsy experience substantially lower health-related quality of life when compared with the general population norms of the USA, UK, France and Norway, as well as compared with people with chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, diabetes, hypertension and epilepsy. Further research is warranted to identify the longitudinal effects of narcolepsy on health-related quality of life, and to develop a narcolepsy-specific health-related quality of life tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据