4.5 Review

Wooden-based materials: Eco-friendly materials for direct mass spectrometric analysis and microextraction

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 223-232

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202100660

关键词

lignocellulosic materials; mass spectrometry; microextraction; sustainability; wood

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities [FPU19/01488]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [PID2020-112862RB-I00]
  3. Universidad de Cordoba/CBUA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignocellulosic materials have emerged as a sustainable alternative in microextraction techniques, adhering to principles of Green Analytical Chemistry. Their porosity, shape, and rigidity allow for use in ambient ionization mass spectrometry techniques, particularly in wooden-tip electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. They can be used for direct analysis of complex samples, with the potential for surface modification to enhance interaction with target compounds.
Lignocellulosic materials have arisen as a sustainable alternative in microextraction techniques during the last 10 years. As they are natural materials, their use fits into some of the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry. Their inherent porosity, narrow shape, and rigidity permit their use in ambient ionization mass spectrometry techniques. In particular, the combination of wooden-based materials and direct analysis gives birth to the so-called wooden-tip electrospray ionization mass spectrometry technique. This approach has been used for the direct analysis of complex samples, and as a streamlined tool for fingerprint quality analysis. Also, wooden-based materials can be superficially modified to boost the interaction with target compounds, allowing their isolation from complex samples. This review describes the potential and applicability of direct analysis using lignocellulosic materials, as well as other alternatives related to their use in microextraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据