4.5 Article

Determination of eight endocrine disruptor pesticides in bovine milk at trace levels by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by GC-MS determination

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 44, 期 15, 页码 2982-2995

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202100183

关键词

dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; endocrine-disrupting pesticides; milk; preconcentration; sample preparation

资金

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi [F.4-2/2006 (BSR)/CH/18-19/0075)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endocrine disrupting chemicals interfere with the hormonal system and can inhibit reproductive activity. A new method was developed for the determination of eight potential endocrine disruptor pesticides in milk samples, showing high efficiency and sensitivity. The study highlighted the importance of monitoring these chemicals in food products.
Endocrine disrupting chemicals are chemicals that interfere with any aspect of the endocrine system. Several natural and synthetic chemicals, including pesticides, have been identified as endocrine disruptors, which potentially inhibit the reproductive activity of the hormonal system. The pervasive occurrence with trace level concentrations and extensive variety are the reported characteristics of these chemicals. In this study, a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry for the determination of eight potential endocrine disruptor pesticides (Lindane, Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Malathion, Aldrin, alpha-Endosulfan, beta-Endosulfan, Methoxychlor) in bovine milk samples was developed. Several parameters that can influence the extraction efficiency were studied. Under optimized conditions, the calibration curves of all eight analytes presented coefficient of determination higher than 0.998 (range level of 2.0-1000 ng/mL). The limits of detection and quantification ranged from 0.90 to 5.00 ng/mL and 2.50 to 15.0 ng/mL, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据