4.7 Article

Revealing active species of CePO4 catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3

期刊

JOURNAL OF RARE EARTHS
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 1232-1237

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jre.2021.07.003

关键词

CePO4 catalyst; Active phase; Calcination temperature; NH3-SCR; Rare earths

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30919011220]
  2. Key Project of Jiangsu Province Programs for Research and Development [BE2019115]
  3. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The roles of amorphous and crystalline structures on CePO4 catalyst during the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx by NH3 were investigated. The findings indicate that the amorphous CePO4 species show higher activity at low temperature, while the crystalline CePO4 species exhibit high activity only at high temperature.
Revealing the active species of the catalyst is conducive to the design of more efficient catalyst. Herein, we tried to demonstrate the roles of amorphous and crystalline structures on CePO4 catalyst during selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx by NH3. Higher calcination temperature promotes the transfer of amorphous structure to crystalline structure on the surface of CePO4. Both amorphous and crystalline CePO4 species on CePO-X samples can provide acid sites for NH3 adsorption, but the former can provide more acid sites. The superior redox property of surface amorphous CePO4 species contributes to its high NH3-SCR activity at low temperature, but it also leads to the decrease of high temperature (>350 degrees C) NH3-SCR activity due to the oxidation of NH3. In contrast, crystalline CePO4 species shows high activity only at high temperature because of its poor redox property. Therefore, it can be inferred that amorphous and crystalline structures on CePO4 catalyst can be the efficient active species of NH3-SCR at low and high temperature, respectively. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Society of Rare Earths.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据