4.7 Article

FIGS: Featured Ion-Guided Stoichiometry for Data-Independent Proteomics through Dynamic Deconvolution

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 4131-4138

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00438

关键词

peptide quantification; data-independent acquisition; dynamic spectral deconvolution; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2017YFA0505500]
  2. Strategic CAS Project [XDA12010000, XDB13040700, XDB38000000]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81561128018]
  4. National Key Technologies RD Program [2017YFA0505502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data-independent acquisition (DIA) offers advantages for peptide quantification in mass spectrometry (MS), but mixed spectra present challenges for precise stoichiometry. This study introduces FIGS, a method for accurate and robust peptide quantification in DIA-MS data, by analyzing library spectra in specific sets and defining featured ions assigned to corresponding precursors. FIGS demonstrates high performance in quantification sensitivity, accuracy, and efficiency, significantly improving accuracy for the full dynamic range, especially low-abundance peptides.
Data-independent acquisition (DIA) has significant advantages for mass spectrometry (MS)-based peptide quantification, while mixed spectra remain challenging for precise stoichiometry. We here choose to analyze the library spectra in specific sets preferentially and locally. Accordingly, the featured ions are defined as the fragment ions uniquely assigned to corresponding precursors in a given spectrum set, which are generated by dynamic deconvolution of the mixed mass spectra. Then, we present featured ion-guided stoichiometry (FIGS), a universal method for accurate and robust peptide quantification for the DIA-MS data. We validate the high performance on the quantification sensitivity, accuracy, and efficiency of FIGS. Notably, our FIGS dramatically improves the quantification accuracy for the full dynamic range, especially for low-abundance peptides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据