4.7 Article

Physiological and transcriptional responses of Phalaris arundinacea under waterlogging conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153428

关键词

Phalaris arundinacea; Waterlogging stress; Grass; RNA-seq

资金

  1. Sichuan Forage Innovation Team Program
  2. Sichuan Natural Science Foundation [2019YFS0457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The response mechanism of Phalaris arundinacea to waterlogging mainly involves differential gene expression and regulation of metabolic processes. A series of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, hormone signaling regulation, etc. were identified. The research findings lay a foundation for further exploring waterlogging resistance genes in Phalaris arundinacea and breeding new strains resistant to waterlogging stress.
As a high-yielding forage grass, Phalaris arundinacea widely distributed in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau region of China. To explore physiological and molecular response mechanism of Phalaris arundinacea under waterlogging, we analyzed the biomass and physiological indexes of three locally grown strains under the submerged condition of 10 cm. The material Z0611 showed the strongest waterlogging resistance while the YS showed the weakest performance. Transcriptome sequencing analysis demonstrated that the YS and Z0611 had 17010 and 7566 differently expression genes (DEGs), respectively, which were mainly concentrated in the metabolic process, cell, ribosome, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway in GO and KEGG databases. We also identified a large number of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, hormone signaling regulation, transcription factors, antioxidant system, and ethylene signaling. Our research may provide a scientific basis for the restoration of wetland environment on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and lay a foundation for further exploration of the waterlogging resistance genes of Phalaris arundinacea and breeding of new strains resistant with waterlogging stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据