4.3 Article

Anastomosis groups and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia isolates causing banded leaf and sheath blight on maize in Shanxi province of China

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 103, 期 4, 页码 1275-1281

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s42161-021-00920-3

关键词

Banded leaf and sheath blight; Rhizoctonia; Anastomosis group; ITS rDNA; Pathogenicity

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi [2019L0832]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Xinzhou City [20180104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia causing banded leaf and sheath blight (BLSB) on maize in Shanxi province of China were identified, with Rhizoctonia solani AG-5 being the most common pathogenic group. This study represents the first report on AGs of Rhizoctonia causing BLSB in Shanxi province, providing valuable information for disease management in maize cultivation.
The anastomosis groups (AGs) of Rhizoctonia causing banded leaf and sheath blight (BLSB) on maize in the Shanxi province of China were identified. In total, 147 isolates of Ceratobasidium (2) and Rhizoctonia (145) were collected in 2017-2018 from maize sheaths in Shanxi province with symptoms of BLSB. Based on the number of nuclei, presence of hyphal anastomosis, and sequence analysis of ITS rDNA, 76 isolates (51.70%) were identified as belonging to Rhizoctonia solani AG-5, 38 (25.85%) as Rhizoctonia zeae (WAG-Z), 20 (13.61%) as Rhizoctonia solani AG-1-IA, 5 (3.40%) as R. solani AG-1-IB, 4 (2.72%) as R. solani AG-4-HGIII, 2 (1.36%) as R. solani AG-4-HGI, and 2 (1.36%) as Ceratobasidium sp. AG-K. All of the Rhizoctonia isolates produced symptoms of BLSB on maize seedlings with the disease incidence 45.16-93.33% and the disease index 15.32-55.00. Rhizoctonia solani AG-5 was the most common AG group causing BLSB in Shanxi province of China. To our knowledge, this is the first report on anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia causing BLSB in Shanxi province of China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据