4.6 Article

A study of the formation of isotopically pure 28Si layers for quantum computers using conventional ion implantation

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac0a07

关键词

ion implantation; isotopically pure layers; quantum computing; semiconductor

资金

  1. UK EPSRC [NS/A000059/1]
  2. Marion Redfearn Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explored the use of conventional ion implantation to create enriched Si-28 layers for quantum computers. Results showed that low energy, ultra-high vacuum implantation is crucial for achieving high Si-28 enrichment levels exceeding 99.9%. However, utilizing ultra-low energy implants may lead to excessive oxygen contamination and compromise the enrichment efficiency.
We have investigated the use of conventional ion implantation to fabricate enriched Si-28 layers for use in quantum computers. The final compositions of samples enriched using ultra-low energy (ULE) (800 eV and 2 keV) and low energy (20 keV) Si-28 implants of varying fluences (1 x 10(16)-3.8 x 10(17) cm(-2)) using two different implanters were measured using channelled Rutherford Backscattering Spectroscopy (RBS). The dynamic, binary collision approximation program TRIDYN was used to model the implantation profiles to guide the analysis of the RBS spectra. It was found that ULE implants achieved high Si-28 enrichment levels but were heavily contaminated with oxygen due to poor vacuum in the implanter wafer end station. It was shown that oxidation could be reduced by using an accelerator with an end station with better vacuum and increasing the implant energy to 20 keV. However, TRIDYN simulations predict that the best Si-28 enrichment levels that could be achieved under these conditions would saturate at similar to 99.2% due to self-sputtering. We modelled a range of conditions with TRIDYN and so recommend low energies (<3 keV), ultra-high vacuum implantation for high Si-28 enrichment (>99.9%) with the lowest possible fluences (similar to 5-10 x 10(17) cm(-2)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据