4.5 Article

Structural and superconducting analysis of topologically non-trivial alloy of Sn1-xSbx (x=0.4, 0.5, 0.6)

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110136

关键词

Topological superconductors; Density functional theory; Crystal growth; Structural details; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

资金

  1. CSIR
  2. UGC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the structural and physical properties of binary alloy Sn1-xSbx (x = 0.4, 0.5, 0.6) grown by the self-flux method, revealing their potential as candidates for topological superconductivity and confirming their type-II superconducting behavior at low temperatures.
In the present article, we report a comprehensive study of structural and physical properties of binary alloy Sn1-xSbx (x = 0.4, 0.5, 0.6). All the alloys are grown through the self-flux method under well-optimized heat treatment. The as-grown crystals are structurally characterized through Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis (EDAX). Simultaneously, the X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) is used to probe the surface of the crystals. All the crystals crystallize in rhombohedral structure with the R - 3 m space group, as confirmed from Rietveld refined PXRD pattern. Sn1-xSbx is found to have a secondary phase with an elongated unit cell in conjunction with the primary phase for a specific alloy of x = 0.6. These binary systems are considered to be a possible candidate of topological super-conductivity as they show the opening of bands near Fermi level with the inclusion of Spin-Orbit Coupling (SOC) protocols in DFT calculations. However, the superconductivity in all samples is confirmed through DC magnetization measurements under Field Cooled (FC) and Zero Field Cooled (ZFC) measurement at 10 Oe magnetic field. The nature of observed superconductivity is determined by isothermal magnetization (M-H) measurements at 2K, in which these binary alloys are proved to be type-II superconductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据