4.8 Article

Plasmon Character Index: An Accurate and Efficient Metric for Identifying and Quantifying Plasmons in Molecules

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 38, 页码 9391-9397

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02645

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Wisconsin via the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A quantum metric, called the plasmon character index (PCI), has been developed to accurately and efficiently identify and quantify plasmons in molecules. This new method shows excellent agreement with predictions from time-dependent density functional theory while being vastly more computationally efficient. PCI can be a useful tool in the rational design of plasmonic molecules and nanoclusters.
Plasmons, which are collective and coherent oscillations of charge carriers driven by an external field, play an important role in applications such as solar energy harvesting, sensing, and catalysis. Conventionally, plasmons are found in bulk and nanomaterials and can be described with classical electrodynamics. In recent years, plasmons have also been identified in molecules, and these molecules have been utilized to build plasmonic devices. As molecular plasmons can no longer be described by classical electrodynamics, a description using quantum mechanics is necessary. In this Letter, we develop a quantum metric to accurately and efficiently identify and quantify plasmons in molecules. A number, which we call the plasmon character index (PCI), can be calculated for each electronic excited state and describes the plasmonicity of the excitation. PCI is developed from the collective and coherent excitation picture in orbitals and shows excellent agreement with the predictions from scaled time-dependent density functional theory but is vastly more computationally efficient. Therefore, PCI can be a useful tool in identifying and quantifying plasmons and will inform the rational design of plasmonic molecules and nanoclusters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据