4.8 Article

Electric Field Controlled Single-Molecule Optical Switch by Through-Space Charge Transfer State

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 37, 页码 9094-9099

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02578

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2017YFA0303500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21633007, 21790350, 22073017, 21973081]
  3. Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies [AHY090000]
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Program [19PJ1400600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a new mechanism for controlling the photon emission of a single molecule using the in situ electric field in biased metallic nanojunctions. The proposed mechanism was theoretically verified and the switching effect can be achieved by changing bias polarity or tip-height. This finding suggests that the in situ electric field could have a significant role in the design of optoelectronic molecular devices.
Controlling the photon emission property of a single molecule is an important goal for nano-optics. We propose here a new mechanism for a single-molecule optical switch that utilizes the in situ electric field (EF) in biased metallic nanojunctions to control photon emission of molecules with through-space charge transfer (TSCT) excited states. The EF-induced Stark effect is capable of flipping the order of the bright noncharge transfer state and dark TSCT state, resulting in the anticipated switching behavior. The proposed mechanism was theoretically verified by scanning tunneling microscope-induced electroluminescence from a naphtalenediimide cyclophane molecule under experimentally accessible conditions. Simulations show that the proposed switching effect can be obtained by changing either bias polarity, which alters the polarization of the field, or tip-height, which affects the magnitude of the field. Our finding indicates that the in situ EF could play an important role in the design of optoelectronic molecular devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据