4.7 Article

Root rather than leaf litter input drives soil carbon sequestration after afforestation on a marginal cropland

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 362, 期 -, 页码 38-45

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.048

关键词

Cropland; Afforestation; Subsurface soil; Litter input; SOC sequestration; C-13 stable isotope

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41271318, 31270668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Afforestation on croplands has been proposed as a means to mitigate the increasing emission of anthropogenic CO2. However, the relative contribution of above- and belowground litter input on soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration following afforestation is not fully understood. We used a 270-day laboratory incubation experiment to examine the impact of litter type (i.e., leaf vs. fine root litter) of a poplar tree (Populus simonii Carr., C-3 plant) on soil respiration and the turnover of new vs. old soil C in surface (0-10 cm) and subsurface mineral soils (40-50 cm) collected from a marginal cropland planted to maize (Zea mays L., C-4 plant) in a semi-arid region in northeast China. Our results showed that fine root rather than leaf litter addition helps to sequester SOC even though soil microbial respiration rates were stimulated by both leaf and fine root litter input. Neither leaf nor fine root litter addition stimulated mineralization of old soil C across the two soil layers, but more new C was incorporated into the soil with fine root addition as compared with leaf litter addition. Moreover, the subsurface soil had greater potential to sequester SOC as compared to the surface soil. Our results suggest that root rather than leaf litter input drives soil carbon sequestration on the marginal soil, especially in the subsurface soil, and planting deep-rooted trees with large belowground biomass production could be used to increase SOC sequestration in marginal croplands. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据