4.8 Article

Rotational Modulation of (A)over-tilde2A-State Photodissociation of HCO via Renner-Teller Nonadiabatic Transitions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 28, 页码 6582-6588

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01932

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0015997, DE-SC0019740]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [CHE1566636]
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21733006]
  5. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0206500]
  6. University Cooperation and Innovation Program of Anhui Province [GXXT 2020-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dissociation dynamics of the nonadiabatic predissociation system HCO is strongly modulated by parent rotational quantum numbers, leading to a unique purely quantum mechanical behavior. The appearance of vibrational ground and excited states of CO product is attributed to the dependence of vibronic resonance lifetime on parent rotational angular momentum quantum numbers coupled with transient intensity borrowing.
By examining the product-state distribution of a prototypical nonadiabatic predissociation system, HCO((A) over tilde (2)A ''-X(2)A'), we demonstrate that the dissociation dynamics is strongly modulated by parent rotational quantum numbers. The predissociation of the nominal (nu(C-H) = 0,nu(bend), nu(C-O) = 1) vibronic levels of the (A) over tilde 2A '' state surprisingly gives rise to both vibrational ground and excited states of the CO product, despite the assumed spectator nature of the CO moiety. This anomaly is attributed to the dependence of the lifetime of the vibronic resonance facilitated by the Renner-Teller interaction on the parent rotational angular momentum quantum numbers coupled with transient intensity borrowing from nearby vibronic resonances with nu(C-O) = 0. This unique phenomenon is a purely quantum mechanical behavior that has no classical analogue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据