4.8 Article

Effects of Macromolecular Crowding on Nanoparticle Diffusion: New Insights from Mossbauer Spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 29, 页码 6804-6811

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01984

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [17-00-00444]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for the Valiev Institute of Physics and Technology of RAS [0066-2019-0004, 17-00-00443]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [21-13-00438]
  4. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [K2-2020-029]
  5. Russian Science Foundation [21-13-00438] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Mossbauer spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering were used to investigate the self-diffusion coefficient and hydrodynamic size of iron-containing nanoparticles in complex solutions. The results show that the diffusion of CFNs greatly affects the broadening of Mossbauer spectra.
In this work, we used Mossbauer spectroscopy as a new approach for experimental quantification of the self-diffusion coefficient (D-Mossbauer) and hydrodynamic (HD) size of ironcontaining nanoparticles (NPs) in complex crowded solutions, mimicking cell cytoplasm. As a probe, we used 9 nm cobalt ferrite NPs (CFNs) dispersed in solutions of bovine serum albumin (BSA) with a volume fraction (phi(BSA)) of 0-0.2. Our results show that the broadening of MOssbauer spectra is highly sensitive to the diffusion of CFNs, while when phi(BSA) = 0.2, the CFN-normalized diffusivity is reduced by 86% compared to that of a protein-free solution. CFN colloids were also studied by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Comparison of the experimental data shows that DLS significantly underestimates the diffusion coefficient of CFNs and, consequently, overestimates the HD size of CFNs at phi(BSA) > 0, which cannot be attributed to the formation of the BSA monolayer on the surface of CFNs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据