4.8 Article

Detection and Separation of Single-Stranded DNA Fragments Using Solid-State Nanopores

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 28, 页码 6469-6477

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01163

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52005102, 52075099]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180400]
  3. Primary Research & Development Plan of Jiangsu Province [SBE2020741118]
  4. Scientific Research Project of Jiangsu Health Commission [ZDA2020012]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242021k30057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates a solid-state nanopore platform for label-free detection and separation of short single-stranded DNA fragments based on length-dependent translocation behaviors. The controllable selectivity of ssDNA can be achieved by tuning nanopore size, with a maximum selectivity limitation of 30nt.
Many biological assays require effectively and sensitively sorting DNA fragments. Here, we demonstrate a solid-state nanopore platform for label-free detection and separation of short single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) fragments (<100 nt), based on their length-dependent translocation behaviors. Our experimental data show that each sized pore has a passable length threshold. The negative charged ssDNA fragments with length smaller than the threshold can be electrically facilitated driven through the correspondingly sized nanopore along the direction of electric field. In addition, the passable length threshold increases with the pore size enlarging. As a result, this phenomenon is able to be applicable for the controllable selectivity of ssDNA by tuning nanopore size, and the selectivity limitation is up to 30nt. Numerical simulation results indicate the translocation direction of ssDNA is governed by the competition of electroosmosis and electrophoresis effects on the ssDNA and offer the relationship between passable length threshold and pore size.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据