4.8 Article

Quantum Dot Self-Assembly Deposition in Physically Confined Microscale Space by Using an Inkjet Printing Technique

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 35, 页码 8605-8613

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02470

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62075043]
  2. Fujian Science & Technology Innovation Laboratory for Optoelectronic Information of China [2021ZZ126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, it was found that physically confined space can affect the flow and self-assembly process of droplets in inkjet printing techniques, without the need for additional modification of quantum dots or solvents. Additionally, the research results provide important guidance for inkjet-printed patterning applications.
Inkjet printing technique is susceptible to form coffer-ring patterns and inhomogeneous films owing to the evaporation and its accompanying hydrodynamics of microscale quantum dot droplet. Pioneer efforts are usually confined to two-dimensional flat substrates and inks with mixed solvents/additives. Herein we demonstrate that physically confined space offers an additional parameter in tailoring such processes of droplets and the following quantum-dot self-assembly deposition, without extra modification of quantum dots or solvent chemistry. Owing to the boundary of physically confined space, two three-phase border lines in both the bottom center (horizontal direction) and the barrier of the bank substrate (vertical direction) arise, inducing dual capillary flows and Marangoni backflows. The evaporation, fluid flow, and film-forming process in physically confined space are studied by introducing well-prepared single-solvent quantum dots inks. The systematical analysis offers valuable instructions including ink preparation, surface modification, and postprocessing evaporation technique for inkjet-printed patterning applications, especially for pixelated display, polychrome patterning, and sensor array.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据