4.8 Article

One-Step Green Solvothermal Synthesis of Full-Color Carbon Quantum Dots Based on a Doping Strategy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 37, 页码 8939-8946

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02475

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21771172]
  2. Research Equipment Development Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [YJKYYQZ20200005]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2013150]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB20000000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple strategy for developing full-color carbon quantum dots (CQDs) was proposed, resulting in the synthesis of blue, green, yellow-green, and orange-red CQDs doped with heteroatoms. The study also explored how luminescence can be tuned and improved in CQDs. Furthermore, a high-efficiency white light-emitting diode was successfully fabricated with high color rendering index.
Proposing a simple strategy for developing full-color carbon quantum dots (CQDs) and exploring how the luminescence can be tuned and improved is attractive and encouraging. Herein, blue, green, yellow-green, and orange-red CQDs doped with heteroatoms were synthesized in one pot and separated by column chromatography, with emission peaks of 435 nm, 495 nm [photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of 88.9%], 525 nm, and 595 nm (full width at half-maximum of 31 nm), respectively. The abundant C-O/C-O-C electron donor groups greatly improve the PLQY of green CQDs, and the expended effective conjugated domains (particle size, doped chlorine, and conjugated nitrogen) of CQDs boost the red-shifts of emission spectra. Energy transfer (ET) in a concentrated mixed solution of CQDs was discovered, and possible ET mechanisms are proposed. Furthermore, a high-efficiency white lightemitting diode with Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage coordinates of (0.361, 0.369), a correlated color temperature of 4534 K, and a high color rendering index of 90.8 was fabricated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据