4.8 Article

Submicrosecond Aggregation during Detonation Synthesis of Nanodiamond

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 22, 页码 5286-5293

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01209

关键词

-

资金

  1. LLNL LDRD [14ERD-018]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344 (LLNL-JRNL-820295)]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)/National Nuclear Security Administration [DENA0002442]
  4. NNSA's Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation and Science Campaign 2
  5. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  6. Lawrence Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental results show that detonation nanodiamond (DND) aggregates into low fractal dimension structures within 0.1 microseconds, indicating that DND aggregation occurs on time scales comparable to particle formation. This was observed through time-resolved small-angle X-ray scattering experiments.
Detonation nanodiamond (DND) is known to form aggregates that significantly reduce their unique nanoscale properties and require postprocessing to separate. How and when DND aggregates is an important question that has not been answered experimentally and could provide the foundation for approaches to limit aggregation. To answer this question, time-resolved small-angle X-ray scattering was performed during the detonation of high-explosives that are expected to condense particulates in the diamond, graphite, and liquid regions of the carbon phase diagram. DND aggregation into low fractal dimension structures could be observed as early as 0.1 mu s, along with a separate scattering population also observed from an explosive that produces primarily graphitic products. A counterexample is the case of a high-explosive that produces nano-onions, where no hierarchical scattering was observed for at least 10 mu s behind the detonation front. These results suggest that DND aggregation occurs on time scales comparable to particle formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据