4.6 Article

Ternary Ti-Mo-Fe Nanotubes as Efficient Photoanodes for Solar-Assisted Water Splitting

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 23, 页码 12504-12517

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c01478

关键词

-

资金

  1. American University in Cairo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By optimizing the alloy composition and fabrication process, we successfully prepared Ti-Mo-Fe alloy nanotubes with enhanced conductivity, improved photocatalytic performance, and remarkable stability. These optimized nanotubes showed better photocatalytic activity compared to bare TiO2 nanotubes.
Designing efficient and stable water splitting photocatalysts is an intriguing challenge for energy conversion systems. We report on the optimal fabrication of perfectly aligned nanotubes on trimetallic Ti-Mo-Fe alloy with different compositions prepared via the combination of metallurgical control and facile electrochemical anodization in organic media. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns revealed the presence of composite oxides of anatase TiO2 and magnetite Fe3O4 with better stability and crystallinity. With the optimal alloy composition Ti(5.0 atom %) Mo-(5.0 atom %) Fe anodized for 16 h, enhanced conductivity, improved photocatalytic performance, and remarkable stability were achieved in comparison with Ti-(3.0 atom %) Mo-(1.0 atom %) Fe samples. Such optimized nanotube films attained an enhanced photocatalytic activity of similar to 0.272 mA/cm(2) at 0.9 VSCE, which is approximately 4 times compared to the bare TiO2 nanotubes fabricated under the same conditions (similar to 0.041 mA/cm(2) at 0.9 VSCE). That was mainly correlated with the emergence of Mo and Fe impurities within the lattice, providing excess charge carriers. Meanwhile, the nanotubes showed outstanding stability with a longer electron lifetime. Moreover, carrier density variations, lower charge transfer resistance, and charge carriers dynamics features were demonstrated via the Mott-Schottky and electrochemical impedance analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据