4.6 Article

Bulk Assembly of Zero-Dimensional Organic Copper Bromide Hybrid with Bright Self-Trapped Exciton Emission and High Antiwater Stability

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 36, 页码 20014-20021

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05065

关键词

-

资金

  1. Guangxi Bagui Scholars foundation
  2. Guangxi NSF project [2020GXNSFDA238004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, Cu(I)-based metal halides have attracted great attention for their intriguing structures and optoelectronic properties. A zero-dimensional organic copper bromide hybrid was synthesized, showing a bright broadband cyan emission with a PLQY of 55% and exceptional antiwater stability. This work demonstrates the potential of Cu(I) as a high antiwater stability luminescent material with appropriate organic ligands, paving the way for lead-free metal halides with high antiwater properties.
Recently, Cu(I)-based metal halides have gained great attention due to their fascinating structures and optoelectronic properties. Her; we report the synthesis, crystal structure, and photophysical properties of zero-dimensional (OD) organic copper bromide hybrid, where the isolated [CuBr2](-) units are encircled by the organic cation of TBA(+) (TBA(+) = tetrabutylammonium cation), forming the bulk assembly of periodic 0D blocks. Moreover, this 0D structure enables strong electron-phonon interaction to promote the formation of a self-trapped excited state that shows a bright broadband cyan emission with a photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of 55% for (TBA)CuBr2 single crystals (SCs). Particularly, the as-synthesized compound shows extraordinary antiwater stability, and its PL intensity remains above 99.1% after soaking in water for 24 h. This work illustrates that the water-sensitive Cu(I) can also be used as a high antiwater stability luminescent material by introducing appropriate multifunctional organic ligands, thus opening up a new route for high antiwater materials based on lead-free metal halides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据