4.6 Article

Electronic and Optical Modulation of Pine Tree-like Nanostructures of Gallium Nitride

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 25, 页码 13917-13924

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02819

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its Academic Research Fund Tier 2 [MOE2016-T2-1-052]
  2. Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its Academic Research Fund Tier 1 [MOE2019-T1-002063]
  3. Toray Science and Technology Research Grant 2021

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the synthesis and characterization of gallium nitride (GaN) pine tree-like nanostructures (PTLNs) grown by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition. Various analysis techniques show that these structures exhibit n-type electronic characteristics, with a determined work function and valence band maximum. The experimental findings are consistent with density functional theory calculations and show potential for optoelectronic and sensing applications in the future.
We present the synthesis and characterization of gallium nitride (GaN) pine tree-like nanostructures (PTLNs) grown by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition. A high yield of PTLNs is densely arranged with each PTLN having a typical length of 15.46 +/- 3.38 mu m. From Raman spectroscopy, we observe an E-2(H) peak at 570 +/- 6 cm(-1) which is the primary characteristic of wurtzite. X-ray and ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy reveal that the electronic structures of GaN PTLNs indicate an n-type character, while the work function and valence band maximum are determined to be 3.30 +/- 0.05 and 3.85 +/- 0.08 eV, respectively. We confirm the electronic nature of our structure from the current-voltage characteristics exhibiting rectifying behavior. Density functional theory calculations of GaN PTLNs modeled by germanium-doped GaN nanowires are consistent with our experimental findings. To summarize, the energy-band diagram is presented for the future of GaN PTLNs in the optoelectronic and sensing applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据