4.6 Article

Quantitatively Understanding the Insights into CO2 Adsorption on Faujasite from the Heterogeneity and Occupancy Sequence of Adsorption Sites

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 28, 页码 15676-15686

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04254

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0603702]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study quantified the site heterogeneity for CO2 adsorption on NaX, finding that the distance between C and O-z serves as an indicator of heterogeneity controlled by interacting cations. The calculated adsorption heats and isotherms based on heterogeneity-based models matched experimental results for NaX and NaY.
The heterogeneity in adsorption site is a fundamental characteristic of adsorption that is difficult to quantify. Herein, we quantify the site heterogeneity for CO2 adsorption on NaX by recognizing the characteristics, types, and site occupancies at different loadings. We find an adsorption site geometry of Na center dot center dot center dot O=C=O perpendicular to O-z (where Oz denotes an oxygen atom in the zeolite) and that the distance between C and O-z is an indicator of heterogeneity. This distance is controlled by the interacting cations on SIII (Na-III), where the energies (numbers) of the dual-, single-, and zero-Na-III adsorption sites are -57.2, -43.1, and -29.5 kJ/mol (17, 57, and 26 uc, (per unit cell)), respectively. The adsorption heats and isotherms calculated using heterogeneity-based models agree reasonably with experimental results for both NaX and NaY. An abundance of mechanisms underlying the trends in the adsorption heats and isotherms are elucidated based on the heterogeneity in the adsorption sites. Applying the proposed method to an LTA-4A zeolite shows that the adsorption site geometries do not change and that the distance between C and O-z remains an indicator of heterogeneity. These consistencies support the transferability of the proposed method to other zeolites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据