4.6 Article

First-Principles Investigation of Ti2CSO and Ti2CSSe Janus MXene Structures for Li and Mg Electrodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 23, 页码 12469-12477

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00082

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [1940099, 1905775]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MXenes materials show potential for applications in Li and Mg electrodes, with different surface terminations affecting their electrochemical properties and ion diffusion barriers.
While lithium battery electrodes are constantly being improved in terms of their performance, discovering new materials with alternative energy carriers such as Mg is important to lower the cost of production and to enhance the energy density. MXenes are a type of highly investigated materials with promising energy applications due to their excellent electronic conductivity and good mechanical and dynamical stability. Previous experimental studies showed that Janus MoSSe nanosheets provide promising performance for battery electrodes. However, it is not fully understood how MXenes with different surface terminations affect the electrochemical properties and the diffusion barriers of ions. Here, we address this problem by studying Ti2CSO and Ti2CSSe Janus MXenes for Li and Mg electrodes. Our density functional theory-based, first-principles calculations indicate that both monolayers are thermodynamically, mechanically, and dynamically stable. We calculated that the average voltages for Li- and Mg-adsorbed Ti2CST (T = O and Se) MXenes are approximately 0.95 and 0.2 V, respectively. The maximum voltage for Ti2CSTLix is about 2 V and that for Ti2CSTMgx is around 0.45 V. The Mg-adsorbed Ti2CSO monolayer exhibits the highest gravimetric capacity (524.54 mA h/g) compared to that of other Janus MXenes considered in this paper. For Ti2CSSeLix, we obtained a higher capacity (230.45 mA h/g) and a lower diffusion barrier (0.191 eV) than those of most of the Li-adsorbed S-functionalized MXenes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据