4.6 Article

Resonant Band-Edge Emissive States in Strongly Confined CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanoplatelets

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 26, 页码 14317-14325

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c01353

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_175729]
  2. National Center of Competence in Research Molecular Ultrafast Science and Technology (NCCR-MUST), a research instrument of the SNF
  3. Swiss Confederation
  4. Federal University of Sao Joao del-Rei
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_175729] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated early exciton dynamics in strongly confined all-inorganic cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals, revealing the formation and relaxation process of emitting band-edge states and confined hole states. Increasing pump excitation intensity led to longer band-edge population lifetime due to confined hole state filling.
Strongly confined, fully inorganic cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals are of great promise for light-emitting devices in the blue spectral range owing to their high photoluminescence quantum yields. A combination of broadband fluorescence up-conversion and transient absorption spectroscopies was used to study early exciton dynamics in quasi-1D CsPbBr3 nanoplatelets (3 x 4 x 23 nm3, NPls). This allowed to reveal emitting band-edge states in the NPls that form instantaneously upon photoexcitation and then relax within the first picosecond to lower energy confined hole states (CHSs). The influence of the pump excitation intensity on the latter process was further scrutinized. The band-edge population lifetime was found to increase with the rise of the photon fluence due to CHS filling. When the concentration of NPls in solution becomes very high, nanoparticles overlap, resulting in a decrease in their external absorption cross-section and an increase in the emission Stokes shift due to photon reabsorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据