4.6 Article

Theoretical Insights into MXene Termination and Surface Charge Regulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 39, 页码 21771-21779

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07076

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures, and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MXenes, a two-dimensional material with promising applications, have been studied for their surface termination's influence on performance. By using first-principles and micor-thermodynamic models, researchers are able to predict MXene structure, surface termination, and charge regulation under varying solution conditions. Together, these models provide a powerful computational platform for investigating MXene behavior in practical settings.
MXenes are two-dimensional materials promising for diverse applications ranging from electrical energy storage to biomedical devices. Whereas the importance of surface termination on MXene performance has been well documented, understanding the surface structure and its variation with the environment has been a fundamental challenge from both theoretical and experimental perspectives. Herein, we propose complementary firstprinciples and micro-thermodynamic models to predict MXene structure, surface termination, and charge regulation in response to variations of solution conditions. While the first-principles calculations allow us to identify the atomic structure and the electronic behavior of the layered materials, the thermodynamic model provides useful quantitative description of the surface charge in terms of the electric potential and solution conditions. Together, the theoretical models offer a powerful computational platform to investigate the MXene termination and charging behavior under conditions of practical interest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据