4.6 Article

Hybrid Floating Gate Memory with a Large Memory Window Based on the Sandwich Structure

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 23, 页码 12903-12909

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02158

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61735010, 91838301]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0700202]
  3. Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program [JCYJ20170412154447469]
  4. Beiyang Yong Junior Faculties of Tianjin University [2019XRG-0056]
  5. Innovation Projects of Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2018KQNCX264]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers demonstrated a high-performance hybrid floating gate memory with a large memory window, showing the enhanced effect of the sandwich structure on the memory window. The new memory device exhibited admirable endurance and retention characteristics.
Hybrid floating gate memories (HFGMs) based on organic field-effect transistors have been extensively investigated owing to their remarkable charge trapping performance, good compatibility with integrated circuit, and simple solution preparation process. Here, a high-performance HFGM with a large memory window is demonstrated by sandwiching a [6,6]-phenyl-C-61-butyric acid methyl ester@polystyrene hybrid floating gate between two layers of pentacene. A series of programming operations with different voltages and time prove the enhanced effect of the sandwich structure on the memory window. The memory window is enlarged by up to 347% under different programming operations. Compared to the memory device without the sandwich structure, the new memory device also presents admirable endurance and retention characteristics in 600 continuous erasing-reading-programing-reading cycling and data retention tests. Thus, the HFGM with the sandwich structure provides a feasible path to develop high-performance memory devices with a large memory window, which is beneficial for practical application and popularization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据