4.5 Article

Measuring Excess Heat Capacities of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Folding at the Single-Molecule Level

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 125, 期 34, 页码 9719-9726

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c05555

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1665271]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-15-1-0090]
  3. Physics Frontier Center Program [PHY-1734006]
  4. National Institutes of Health Molecular Biophysics Training Grant [T32 GM-065103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study measured the heat capacity changes in DNA folding at the single-molecule level and the transition state, finding that the results were consistent with previous literature expectations.
Measurements of the thermodynamic properties of biomolecular folding (Delta G degrees, Delta H degrees, Delta S degrees, etc.) provide a wealth of information on the folding process and have long played a central role in biophysical investigation. In particular, the excess heat capacity of folding (Delta C-P) is crucial, as typically measured in bulk ensemble studies by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Here, we report the first measurements of Delta C-P at the single-molecule level using the single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) as well as the very first measurements of the heat capacity change associated with achieving the transition state (Delta C-P(double dagger)) for nucleic acid folding. The deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) hairpin used in these studies exhibits an excess heat capacity for hybridization (Delta C-P = -340 +/- 60 J/mol/K per base pair) consistent with the range of literature expectations (Delta C-P = -100 to -420 J/mol/K per base pair). Furthermore, the measured activation heat capacities (Delta C-P(double dagger)) for such hairpin unfolding are consistent with a folding transition state containing few fully formed base pairs, in agreement with prevailing models of DNA hybridization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据