4.5 Article

Nanotube Template-Directed Formation of Strongly Coupled Dye Aggregates with Tunable Exciton Fluorescence Controlled by Switching between J- and H-Type Electronic Coupling

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 125, 期 27, 页码 7447-7455

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c02750

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board, Government of India [SERB -SRG/2019/001410]
  2. National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli
  3. DST
  4. Department of Science and Technology (DST - INSPIRE Research Grant), Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the control of tubular pseudoisocyanine (PIC) dye J- and H-aggregate formation using lithocholic acid (LCA) as a template, resulting in tunable exciton fluorescence. By adjusting the LCA/PIC molar ratio, the optical properties of the dye aggregates can be switched, providing important guidelines for the design of organic photo-functional materials.
Strongly coupled dye aggregates with tailored exciton properties may find their use in developing artificial light-harvesting and optoelectronic devices. Here, we report the control of tubular pseudoisocyanine (PIC) dye J- and H-aggregate formation with tunable exciton fluorescence using lithocholic acid (LCA) as a template. The LCA-templated PIC J-aggregate nanotubes formed at a higher LCA/PIC molar ratio (>= 5:1) exhibit a sharp, red-shifted absorption band (at 555 nm), intense fluorescence (at 565 nm), and shorter lifetime (200 ps), all indicating their strong superradiance properties. In contrast, the H-aggregate nanotubes formed at a lower LCA/PIC molar ratio (2:1) exhibit a significantly blue-shifted absorption band (at 420 nm) and highly red-shifted fluorescence emission (at 600 nm) with enhanced lifetime (4.40 ns). The controlled switching of the optical properties of the PIC dye aggregates achieved by controlling the LCA/PIC molar ratio could serve as an important guideline for the design of organic photo-functional materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据