4.6 Article

Quantification of the Helicality of Helical Molecular Orbitals

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 125, 期 36, 页码 8107-8115

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c05799

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [865870]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [865870] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a method to calculate the helical curvature of linear carbon molecules' frontier molecular orbitals, providing a powerful way to quantify helical nature that can be applied to various types of carbon molecules. The results show that this method can accurately assess the helical properties of different types of molecules, paving the way for further research on how helicality affects molecular properties.
The frontier molecular orbital (MO) topology of linear carbon molecules, such as polyynes, can be visually identified as helices. However, there is no clear way to quantify the helical curvature of these pi-MOs, and it is thus challenging to quantify correlations between the helical curvature and molecular properties. In this paper, we develop a method that enables us to compute the helical curvature of MOs based on their nodal planes. Using this method, we define a robust way of quantifying the helical nature of MOs (helicality) by their deviation from a perfect helix. We explore several limiting cases, including polyynes, metal-lacumulenes, cyclic allenes, and spiroconjugated systems, where the change in helical curvature is subtle yet clearly highlighted with this method. For example, we show that strain only has a minor effect on the helicality of the frontier orbitals of cycloallenes and that the MOs of spiroconjugated systems are close to perfect helices around the spiro-carbon. Our work provides a well-defined method for assessing orbital helicality beyond visual inspection of MO isosurfaces, thus paving the way for future studies of how the helicality of pi-MOs affects molecular properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据