4.6 Article

An ex vivo model of human skin photoaging induced by UVA radiation compatible with summer exposure in Brazil

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112255

关键词

Human skin; ex vivo model; UVA radiation; Photoaging

资金

  1. CAPES
  2. FAPERJ
  3. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a human ex vivo photoaging model induced by UVA exposure, showing that the model is capable of evaluating UVA-induced skin aging by demonstrating increased oxidative damage, inflammatory cells, collagenolytic and elastolytic MMPs expression, as well as decreased elastin expression.
Skin is the largest body organ and can be affected by several factors, such as ultraviolet (UV) radiation. UV radiation is subdivided in UVA, UVB and UVC according to the radiation wavelength. UVC radiation does not cross the ozone layer; UVB cause DNA damage and is closely related to carcinogenesis; UVA radiation penetrates deeply into the skin, reaching epidermis and dermis and is considered the main promoter of skin aging, known as photoaging. In order to understand photoaging mechanisms and propose efficient therapies, several photoaging study models have been developed, each with benefits and limitations, but most of them use very high doses of UVA radiation, which is not compatible with our daily sun exposure. The objective of this work was to develop a human ex vivo photoaging model induced by UVA exposure compatible to a summer in Brazil. For this, human skin fragments were obtained from healthy donors who underwent otoplasty surgery and skin explants were prepared and placed in plates, with the epidermis facing upwards. Skin explants were exposed to UVA at 16 J/ cm2 carried out by protocols of 2 or 4 exposures. Results showed an increase of oxidative damage, inflammatory cells, collagenolytic and elastolytic MMPs expression as well as a decrease of elastin expression, suggesting that the experimental model based on skin explants is able to evaluate UVA-induced aging in human skin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据