4.2 Article

Alleviation of norflurazon-induced photobleaching by overexpression of Fe-chelatase in transgenic rice

期刊

JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE SCIENCE
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 258-266

出版社

PESTICIDE SCI SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1584/jpestics.D21-021

关键词

chlorophyll fluorescence; Fe-chelatase; heme; photobleaching; porphyrin

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2018R1D1A1B07043814, NRF2020R1I1A3073932]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expression of BjFeCh in transgenic rice helps alleviate NF-induced photobleaching by protecting the synthesis of chlorophyll intermediates and maintaining higher levels of porphyrin biosynthetic gene transcripts, contributing to understanding the resistance mechanism of NF-resistant crops and establishing a new weed control strategy.
We examined the effect of Bradyrhizobium japonicum FeCh (BjFeCh) expression on the regulation of porphyrin biosynthesis and resistance to norflurazon (NF)-induced photobleaching in transgenic rice. In response to NF, transgenic lines F4 and F7 showed lesser declines in chlorophyll, carotenoid, F-v/F-m, phi(PSII), and light-harvesting chlorophyll (Lhc) a/b-binding proteins as compared to wild-type ( WT) plants, resulting in the alleviation of NF-induced photobleaching. During photobleaching, levels of heme, protoporphyrin IX (Proto IX), Mg-Proto IX (monomethylester), and protochlorophyllide decreased in WT and transgenic plants, with lesser decreases in transgenic plants. Most porphyrin biosynthetic genes were greatly downregulated in WT and transgenic plants following NF treatment, with higher transcript levels in transgenic plants. The expression of BjFeCh in transgenic rice may play a protective role in mitigating NF-induced photobleaching by maintaining levels of heme, chlorophyll intermediates, and Lhc proteins. This finding will contribute to understanding the resistance mechanism of NF-resistant crops and establishing a new strategy for weed control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据