4.7 Article

Eucalyptus plantation effects on soil carbon after 20 years and three rotations in Brazil

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 359, 期 -, 页码 92-98

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.035

关键词

Eucalyptus; Plantation; Soil carbon; Brazil

类别

资金

  1. Forest Productivity Cooperative
  2. Bruce and Barbara Zobel Travel Grant
  3. Suzano Pulp and Paper
  4. Copener
  5. Fibria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

How will shifting land use from row crops and pasture to intensively managed forests alter soil carbon storage? Demand and profitability has led to a dramatic increase in Eucalyptus production with a total planted area over 20 million hectares worldwide. The impacts of these short-rotation (6- to 8-year harvest cycle) Eucalyptus plantations on soil carbon appear to be variable, and the available case studies are typically too short term to support generalization. Spatial heterogeneity of soils across landscapes requires repeated sampling for reliable documentation of soil carbon changes over multiple rotations. We characterized soil carbon stocks and change over two decades in 306 operational Eucalyptus plantations across a 1200-km gradient. Across all sites, soil C (0-30 cm depth) in 2010 averaged 29 Mg ha(-1) (0.70 Mg ha(-1)), tending to increase with increasing soil clay content, precipitation, and mean annual temperature. Average soil C from the original sampling to 2010 (ranging from 18 to 26 years or approximately 3 to 4 rotations) showed a slight decrease (-0.22 0.05 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1), P < 0.0001). Tropical sites in Region 1 (Bahia state) showed no net change (-0.11 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1), P = 0.1874, whereas tropical and subtropical sites in Region 2 (Espirito Santo state) lost soil carbon stocks (-0.87 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1), P <0.0001), and subtropical sites in Region 3 (Sao Paulo state) also remained the same (0.06 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1), P = 0.3969). Soil carbon change tended to increase with precipitation during the dry season, and had weaker associations with soil order and mean annual temperature. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据